Candide Essay example - 579 Words

Candide Candide, written by Voltaire during the 18th century is a celebrated novel known for its strong criticism of the Middle Ages and Enlightenment expressed by Voltaire. During the transformation from the Middle Ages to The Enlightenment, social, religious and political ideas were rejected and emphasis was placed on rationalism. Three examples of this notion that are expressed in Candide are as follows. Social conduct that was normally practiced during the 18th century was thrown out of the window during the Enlightenment. Enlightenment thinkers were famous for piercing criticism. Civilians were steadily gaining the newfound knowledge presented by various prodigies during this century. Most people were beginning to think for†¦show more content†¦This was also expressed by Voltaire through a character of Candide. In the book, when Martin tells the story of his life, he refers to two religious ideologies. The Surinamese and the Socinians. He states that the Surinamese clergy persecuted him because they thought he was a Socinian. The Socinians were a Christian sect formed during the Reformation. They rejected the divinity of Christ, the trinity, and original sin. Many people of this era were beginning to do the same thing. At one point, almost everyone practiced the Catholic religion. All things changed though, communities were beginning to allude to new religions thus shunnin g the Catholic religion. Some even declared that they did not believe in God at all. One of these newfound religions, which Martin claims to be, is Manichaeism. These followers believe in the basis of good and evil rather than all good and the all-mighty God. This way of thinking shocked other people of the communities, but little did they know that it would be something expanded upon and fought for in the centuries to come. Politics, during the 18th century, were not what someone of our modern day would think they were. The nobles ran all cities, created and controlled all laws. Those who were in such positions to make these decisions believed to have been lucky enough to be born into wealth and dignity. ThisShow MoreRelatedVoltaire s Candide And `` Candide ``936 Words   |  4 PagesEven though, the broadway play complements Voltaire’s novel, Candide, there are noticeable changes made. These changes are made in order to captivate the audience. Considering the change in time period when Voltaire originally wrote Candide, the changes needed to be made in order to contain more modern aspects that the audience would be drawn to. These changes will be discussed throughout the deliberation of the play, but the most important noticed change would be the doubling of the narrator toRead More Voltaires Candide: The Transformation of Candide Essay1105 Words   |  5 PagesVoltaires Candide: The Transfo rmation of Candide   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Candide (1991), which is another version of Voltaire by French writer Francois-Marie Arouet, is a short but diverse story that tells of a young mans journey for love and the hardships he faces all the while keeping a very strong, positive and philosophical outlook on life. The book starts in an unknown year, hinted sometime around the Renaissance, with a young man named Candide. Candide loves the princess of a Baron and is banished fromRead MoreThe Novel Candide 1535 Words   |  7 PagesCandide, a story written by Voltaire, is a travel literature that takes away women’s freedom. This story talks about the concept of optimism in the characters’ lives. According to Margaret A. Bodena man may make no claims, but merely (habitually) describe situations in a positive rather than a negative way, and the question of justification may not even arise† (A. Boden). Women in this story fail to accept the principle of optimism. This is because everything in their lives is not for theRead MoreCandide Essay1302 Words   |  6 PagesCandide Essay Compare/Contrast of 2 Characters Throughout the story of Candide, the author Voltaire uses many of the characters to portray important things in life. The two characters that Voltaire used the most were Candide and Pangloss. Voltaire used these two characters to represent a particular idea or folly that he had about the world. In the story Candide, Voltaire is always portraying his own ideas by using the characters to illustrate his own ideas. Candide and Pangloss represent theRead MoreEssay on Candide658 Words   |  3 Pages CANDIDE By Voltaire nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Throughout Candide the author, Voltaire, demonstrates the character’s experiences in a cruel world and his fight to gain happiness. In the beginning Candide expects to achieve happiness without working for his goal and only taking the easy way out of all situations. However, by the end of the book the character realized that to achieve happiness a lot of work, compromises, and sacrifices are necessary. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Candide isRead MoreCandide Paper1355 Words   |  6 PagesCandide is a fictional satire of the optimism many philosophers had for life in general during the mid 1700’s written in response to Alexander Pope’s An Essay on Man. Written by Voltaire, the literary alias of Francois-Marie Arouet, the satire covers religion, the wealthy, love, why people thought natural disasters occurred and especially, philosophy. The novel even goes on to make fun of the art of literature by giving ridiculous chapter headings. Just about everything Voltaire put into CandideRead MoreCandide and Free Will1653 Words   |  7 PagesVoltaires Candide is a novel that is interspersed with superficial characters and conceptual ideas that are critically exaggerated and satirized. The parody offers cynical themes disguised by mockeries and witticism, and the story itself presents a distinctive outlook on life narrowed to the concept of free will as opposed to blind faith dri ven by desire for an optimistic outcome. The crucial contrast in the story deals with irrational ideas as taught to Candide about being optimistic by PanglossRead MoreCandide by Voltaire948 Words   |  4 PagesVoltaire’s novel, Candide, encompasses a lot of things. This includes mockery of the beliefs of an opposing philosopher of the Enlightenment period . But perhaps the most powerful of his satires in his novel is on religion. Voltaire believes in God, but rather a forceful disapproval of religion. He believes that all people should serve God in their own way instead of being told how to believe God through religious officials. The first example of Voltaire mocking religion is after Candide leaves the castleRead More Candide Essay1648 Words   |  7 Pages Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire’s novella, Candide, incorporates many themes, yet concentrates a direct assault on the ideas of Leibniz and Pope. These two well-known philosophers both held the viewpoint that the world created by God was the best of all possibilities, a world of perfect order and reason. Pope specifically felt that each human being is a part of God’s great and all knowing plan or design for the world. Voltaire had a very opposite point of view in that he saw a world of needlessRead MoreMWDS Candide4817 Words   |  20 Pages Major Work Data Sheet: Candide Title: Candide Author: Voltaire Date of Publication: 1759 Genre: Satire, ‘Conte Philosophique’ (Philosophical Fiction) Biographical information about the author: Francois-Marie Arouet, better known as Voltaire, was born in 1694 in Paris, France. Though his father wanted him to become a lawyer, Voltaire long held a great passion for writing, and rather than going to law school, spent his time extensively composing poetry, essays, and historical studies. His widespread

Security Essay Topics

<h1>Security Essay Topics</h1><p>Security paper subjects are critical. They characterize the manner in which you compose your articles and impact whether they will even be perused or not. Be that as it may, not all themes in security considers that are typically given to understudies are suitable to article composing. This article records some security paper subjects that are most important.</p><p></p><p>Physical Security The physical security of your organization can decide the security of your workers and the security of your office. In specific circumstances, physical security can be undermined by an individual in an air terminal for instance. It would be of significantly more significance to your representatives and your faculty to know about their physical security consistently. Physical security alludes to the subtleties of the physical condition where an individual must have a sense of security from outer dangers, for example, being te rminated on account of sexual harassment.</p><p></p><p>Physical security is subsequently essential for any association, be it instructive, clinical, legislative or something else. It's imperative to plot the measures that ought to be taken to guarantee that your workers are shielded from outside dangers. A physical security article is along these lines very important.</p><p></p><p>Safety Data Bank Information is amazingly valuable for the security and wellbeing of an association. You can utilize information bank data to structure new systems and techniques, for example, get away from courses, security screening strategies, and new methods to forestall representative wrongdoings. An information bank paper is in this way very important.</p><p></p><p>Data bank expositions are very one of a kind and require an intensive comprehension of how these sorts of practices work. Here, you can detail how to break down these sorts of information, and discover an information bank whose norms are ideal. It is critical to see precisely what an information bank is, and how it works. For instance, it must remember data for any potential occurrences of robbery and address any potential issues in regards to confidentiality.</p><p></p><p>It's basic to be knowledgeable with these information bankessays. In addition to the fact that they are viewed as a fundamental piece of the security measures for any association, yet additionally on the grounds that the information banks can decide the probable results of occasions also. Information bank articles are in this way considered the most disparaging of all security exposition points. They are the premise of every single future system, and by accurately enumerating the information banks, you can establish the framework for your future security strategies.</p><p></p><p>The over five security paper subjects speak to only a couple of the numerous security expositions that can be composed. It is additionally conceivable to incorporate any theme that you like. Truth be told, all your security exposition subjects ought to be of considerable pertinence to the motivation behind your essay.</p>

Easy to Get Cheap Essay Writing

<h1>Easy to Get Cheap Essay Writing</h1><p>Cheap paper composing is something that is especially accessible these days. It doesn't make a difference whether you are an understudy business proficient or even a teacher. You have to get this sort of paper as it is fundamental for the assessment and assessment of your exhibition. You might be offered to have this article arranged by an accomplished paper author or you may likewise get it composed by you yourself.</p><p></p><p>But is it extremely conceivable to compose this sort of exposition without paying tremendous sum? All things considered, it is very conceivable and simple to complete it without paying a lot of cash. It will cost you only a couple of dollars for composing the paper and the nature of the article won't get damaged.</p><p></p><p>So now what you have to do is to locate a fitting exposition composing specialist organization who can take care of business fo r you. The principal thing you have to do is to cause a careful research and afterward to choose the correct specialist co-op. Experience their portfolio with the goal that you know which one is the best for you. Cause a rundown of advantages and disadvantages and afterward to feel free to choose. For example, on the off chance that you are searching for composing employments in a specific timeframe, you will be unable to get a similar measure of cash yet at the same time have the option to offer a decent quality work that will look proficient and convincing.</p><p></p><p>Most of the specialist organizations will charge you for one composing article however they likewise charge for various expositions simultaneously. In the event that you are composing an introductory letter for a vocation and on the off chance that you need to compose various papers about various subjects, at that point you might need to charge in like manner. The statement will rely upon th e term of your task and the general expense. The exploration ought to likewise be made with the goal that you don't cause any pointless cost.</p><p></p><p>Remember that it will require some investment to finish the work than a customary activity so the outcomes will come at a later stage. In any case, in the event that you pay extra and you plan the things well, you will get the outcome you needed. In any case, on the off chance that you need a speedier fulfillment, there are numerous reasonable administrations accessible in the market that will assist you with composing the article in an extremely brief time of time.</p><p></p><p>To get your work finished in a shorter timeframe, you have to examine the organization so you realize that it is solid and has been in the market for quite a while. You additionally need to guarantee that the scholars are accessible nonstop with the goal that your task is finished according to your will.</ p><p></p><p>While composing a whole exposition, you have to understand that you don't get any task from one essayist and this is the reason you have to design your assignments and the date of your accommodation. Do recollect that the article has been composed by one individual thus it will be hard to submit it after some time or even not in any way. So you should design everything great with the goal that your accommodation can be acknowledged easily.</p><p></p><p>So it is anything but difficult to get modest article composing on the off chance that you have the best possible arranging and utilize these administrations at the perfect time. So invest some energy in finding the correct specialist co-op who can finish your task in a quality and great time.</p>

Is It Fine To Say Im Sacred In My College Essay?

Is It Fine To Say I'm Sacred In My College Essay?Do you have a question about the right way to answer the question, 'Is it fine to say I'm sacred in my college essay?' Let's look at the correct way to respond to this question and then look at what is not okay.It is fine to make a judgment as to whether or not what you write is true, since most of the time there are specific circumstances in which we all will be looking for truth. However, you should never use that truth to make judgments about a person's character. This may seem like common sense, but sometimes people will put words in their essay that will then cause the reader to think about what a person really believes, which will in turn make it appear as if the writer of the essay is making judgments about a person's character based on their opinions and their beliefs.You must be very careful when answering the question, 'Is it fine to say I'm sacred in my college essay?' You should be careful to not be controversial in your wr iting. Many writers become controversial and their articles and essays start to fall apart because they try to be too complex. When you are doing anything that is controversial, you will not do well in an essay format.Just remember that just because someone is controversial does not mean that you cannot be very creative in your writing. If you are going to write about someone's opinions or beliefs, then you need to show your audience how these opinions or beliefs are formed by the person and how they apply to real life.The only way that you can demonstrate how a belief is formed is to show your audience that they need to change their moral character. You cannot simply point out how someone made a decision that has affected them and how that decision is now harming them.In order to prove your point, you need to show that the decision was based on one of your points and that their actions are affecting one of your points. This is the best way to show your audience how a person has cha nged their moral character. You should show that by their actions they are changing one of your points and show that by their actions they are altering the nature of their life.This is what I call a discussion of two points, one of which leads to a decision. You cannot just point out how they came to that decision because their life is already changing by the outcome of their decision.There is no reason to use words like 'should'might' because what you are actually saying is that the reader must change their character. This is not necessarily true and this is why writers who say 'Is it fine to say I'm sacred in my college essay?' are asking questions that are not as clear as they seem.

The Use of Force Essay Topics - Tips For Students

The Use of Force Essay Topics - Tips For StudentsWhether you are teaching high school or college students, the use of force is a very effective way to teach students to be ready to defend themselves and to confront their attackers. By the time they graduate, they will be prepared for many types of situations including the use of force to stop a violent attack. In addition, this article provides tips on how to write a the use of force essay topic.Students should be taught how to research topics related to the use of force essay topics. Through the research and questioning students can learn how to determine what type of situation they would be in when confronted with an attacker.The use of force essay topics should be well researched. If it seems like a scenario that only happened once, it probably was not based on any real experience. By writing it down students can analyze it and decide if the use of force would be appropriate in their specific situation.One strong point of the use of force essay topics is the fact that it can help show students how the use of force is justified. Because there is so much pressure to make students feel good about themselves, many teachers tell them that if they pull a gun on a student then it will be their fault. The use of force essay topics can make the students realize that if the person has done nothing wrong, then it is not the student's fault if they are attacked.Another benefit of writing the use of force essay topics is that students will be more inclined to use the police rather than their parents if they were the ones attacked. The police are trained in handling conflicts involving minors. Once students know the police were there to help them, then they are more likely to be pulled over by the police rather than a teen on his own and as a result of this they will be more apt to listen to the officer rather than their parents.Many students use the police when they are not necessarily in an assault situation. This can b e in spite of a parent's permission or in spite of the police's permission. When a student is uncertain of their parents' permission to use force, they can go to the police. This also serves as a test for the officer and can let the officer know if the teenager has the temperament and skills to handle an aggressive situation.Last, when writing the use of force essay topics students should be reminded that violence does not solve any problem. Whether an attack occurred because of the student's inattentiveness or drug abuse, the use of force will not resolve the problem. It just makes the situation worse. The use of force should be used as a last resort to take care of the problem.These tips for writing the use of force essay topics should help students, regardless of grade level, become more familiar with using the use of force. They can then apply the information learned to their lives.

How Democratic Is the Uk Free Essays

How democratic is the UK? Democracy is a difficult concept to define, but as a simplification and a conventional definition, it is the people’s right to choose and the right to say how the country is run. Democracy falls into many categories and comes in various different forms. One form is when power is in the hands of the population as a whole and political decisions are made themselves, this is known as direct democracy. We will write a custom essay sample on How Democratic Is the Uk? or any similar topic only for you Order Now An example of a direct democracy currently present in the UK is a referendum. Another form is representative democracy; in this case citizens will vote for representatives to create decisions for them and the responsibility is handed over to the representative to make decisions for the country. The representatives are also accountable to the electorate. The democratic elections are a crucial part of UK democracy. A core feature is free and fair elections. They are based on universal suffrage, which is when anybody eligible to vote has their own freedom of choice on which party to vote for without any influence. Your elected vote is also kept secret; this process is called the secret ballot. This prevents intimidation from other people and it prevents judgments made on your electoral choice. However there are four groups of people who are ‘unenfranchised’, these people are the homeless, imprisoned convicts, the mentally incapable and the lords. If you aren’t in any of those categories and you satisfy the requirements established by the law, you are then eligible to vote with the free rights of your own electoral choice. Under First Past The Post (FPTP) voting takes place in single-member constituencies. Voters put a cross in a box next to their favored candidate and the candidate with the most votes in the constituency wins. All other votes count for nothing. It’s clear and simple with clear choices and a simple outcome. It allows the voter to clearly express a view on which party they think should form the next government. However, FPTP can be questioned, as it’s not entirely democratic. Representatives can get elected on a small proportion of public support as it doesn’t matter by how much they win, only that they get more votes than the other candidates which in effect wastes uge numbers of votes, as votes cast in a constituency for losing candidates, or for the winning candidate above the level they need to win that seat, count for nothing. FPTP is also disproportionate and biased towards labour or conservatives. This means the votes are of unequal value. Labour votes are inflated and Liberal Democrats votes are deflated. This therefore means the smaller par ties have a significantly depleted chance of winning the votes and it will therefore tend to produce a two-party system, which in turn tends to produce single-party governments. Encouraging two party-party politics can be good, but in a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantages, which means that it goes against the democracy of the UK. Consensus politics is when two major political parties, for example, the Conservative Party and Labour Party, are in agreement, or consensus, over certain basic government policies. The two parties still have small variations but they aren’t significant. They do this to gain voters from the middle ground. It reduces electoral choice because both parties share similar ideologies; it makes everything too similar without distinct variation. UK citizens have shown an obvious enthusiasm to vote for third parties and to clinch a form of political pluralism, which runs directly against the way FPTP operates. FPTP tends to produce a two-party system, which in turn tends to produce single-party governments. However, in a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantaged. This is why FPTP doesn’t work as well as it used to have done. As the UK is changing in terms of politics, more parties are getting involved however these parties have little or no chance in gaining support because of the unequal voting value. This is why I think the UK needs to improve on the FPTP system because it’s restricting it’s full democratic potential. The UK Parliament is built up of two Houses – the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The House of Commons has 646 MPs. The political party with the majority of MPs in the House of Commons forms the Government. The House of Lords has approximately 700 unelected members who examine the work of the House of Commons. The UK Parliament is the main democratic body in the UK and is comprised of three parts: the House of Commons, the House of Lords nd the Sovereign. The UK is a parliamentary democracy and unlike many other democracies it does not have a written constitution. A deliberative assembly is an organization comprising members who use parliamentary procedure to make decisions. A mass meeting, which is an unorganized group meeting open to all individuals in a sector of the population who are interested in to engage in long and careful conc ern about a subject proposed by the meeting’s sponsors. This can include meetings to discuss common political concerns or community interests. This helps towards the democratic process of UK parliament because it in cooperates everybody’s opinion. Parliament is essential to the democratic process in the UK because it is elected by the popular vote, which is therefore democratic, however it has been criticized for being undemocratic because the 2nd Chamber is entirely unelected. This weakens the representative role of parliament. Party discipline also prevents MP’s from using their own judgment in representing their constituents; it also restricts freedom of debate and voting in the House of Commons. Also Parliament’s ability to scrutinize the executive is weak because the government of the day usually has majority control of the House of Commons. Overall, Parliament is strength because it does solely represent the population. However the 2nd chamber is entirely unelected, which does weaken the representative role of parliament but that can be an improved. However, parliament does not govern, its role is to check or constrain the government of the day and it also discusses the policies. Parliament calls the government to account on policies. For those reasons it’s not entirely significant that the 2nd chamber is unelected. Another core feature of UK democracy are pressure groups. They enhance democracy in the UK, because they give a political voice to minorities that are ignored by the majoritarian parliament system. They also provide a way in which citizens can exert influence between elections and they also enhance political participation. However pressure groups don’t have legitimacy and since pressure groups are unelected, they aren’t representative of the majority of the population. Some pressure groups have owerful, but unrepresentative leaders who may not be representative of anyone but themselves. Some leaders do not reflect the opinions of their organization’s members. However, pressure groups are enormously enhancing of the UK democratic system because it gives a political voice to minorities. They allow the population to politically participate and put pressure on the government on issues, which they may turn a blind eye to. This in my opinion is strength of the UK democratic system. Other parts of the UK democratic system enhance democracy in the UK, such as referendums, devolution, the E. U and civil rights. A referendum is a direct vote in which an entire population is asked to either accept or reject a particular proposal. This increases political participation and involves the whole population. However, they can be non-binding. This means the government may not have to do what the results show. Devolution is also another feature of the UK democratic system that increases democracy in the UK. Devolution is the transfer of power from central government to subordinate regional institutions. This means they pass down the powers or duties down from a higher authority to a lower one. This gives the constituent nations of the UK their own political voice. It refined representative democracy by allowing voters in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland separately to express their views about national issues. It also widens the opportunities available for political participation. However the effectiveness of devolution in promoting democracy can be questioned because it has limited powers. Devolution stops well short of ‘home rule’ or full self-government. Although the powers of devolved bodies have, in some cases, widened, major economic and foreign policy decisions are still made at Westminster. Devolution has also done nothing to advance representative democracy in England, which is where 84% of the UK’s population lives. In my opinion referendums are effective in enhancing democracy in the UK because it increases political participation and it allows for a raw opinion on what the public think about particular issues. However, the government can’t be held accountable because they’re not the ones making the decision in a situation where a referendum is used to decide a particular proposal). Devolution however is ineffective in some cases because it doesn’t advance democracy in England, where 84% of the UK’s population lives. However, it does allow for the smaller areas of the UK to focus on particular issues that may be affected by local problems rather than national problems (for example rural area s in Wales). To conclude I think the UK is democratic to a certain degree. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and everyone has the right to free and fair elections. However the UK is being limited by certain blockages in the democratic system such as FPTP. Issues with FPTP can be resolved to allow the UK to reach its full potential of democracy. In a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantaged. This is why FPTP doesn’t work as well as it used to have done. As the UK is changing in terms of politics, more parties are getting involved however these parties have little or no chance in gaining support because of the unequal voting value. Strong points in the UK democratic features are pressure groups. They enhance the democracy in the UK, they allow the population to politically participate and put pressure on the government on issues, which they may turn a blind eye to. This in my opinion is strength of the UK democratic system. Referendums are also effective in enhancing democracy in the UK because it increases political participation and it allows for a raw opinion on what the public think about particular issues. So, to a certain degree, I think the United Kingdom has a strong democratic system. How to cite How Democratic Is the Uk?, Essay examples

How Democratic Is the Uk Free Essays

How democratic is the UK? Democracy is a difficult concept to define, but as a simplification and a conventional definition, it is the people’s right to choose and the right to say how the country is run. Democracy falls into many categories and comes in various different forms. One form is when power is in the hands of the population as a whole and political decisions are made themselves, this is known as direct democracy. We will write a custom essay sample on How Democratic Is the Uk? or any similar topic only for you Order Now An example of a direct democracy currently present in the UK is a referendum. Another form is representative democracy; in this case citizens will vote for representatives to create decisions for them and the responsibility is handed over to the representative to make decisions for the country. The representatives are also accountable to the electorate. The democratic elections are a crucial part of UK democracy. A core feature is free and fair elections. They are based on universal suffrage, which is when anybody eligible to vote has their own freedom of choice on which party to vote for without any influence. Your elected vote is also kept secret; this process is called the secret ballot. This prevents intimidation from other people and it prevents judgments made on your electoral choice. However there are four groups of people who are ‘unenfranchised’, these people are the homeless, imprisoned convicts, the mentally incapable and the lords. If you aren’t in any of those categories and you satisfy the requirements established by the law, you are then eligible to vote with the free rights of your own electoral choice. Under First Past The Post (FPTP) voting takes place in single-member constituencies. Voters put a cross in a box next to their favored candidate and the candidate with the most votes in the constituency wins. All other votes count for nothing. It’s clear and simple with clear choices and a simple outcome. It allows the voter to clearly express a view on which party they think should form the next government. However, FPTP can be questioned, as it’s not entirely democratic. Representatives can get elected on a small proportion of public support as it doesn’t matter by how much they win, only that they get more votes than the other candidates which in effect wastes uge numbers of votes, as votes cast in a constituency for losing candidates, or for the winning candidate above the level they need to win that seat, count for nothing. FPTP is also disproportionate and biased towards labour or conservatives. This means the votes are of unequal value. Labour votes are inflated and Liberal Democrats votes are deflated. This therefore means the smaller par ties have a significantly depleted chance of winning the votes and it will therefore tend to produce a two-party system, which in turn tends to produce single-party governments. Encouraging two party-party politics can be good, but in a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantages, which means that it goes against the democracy of the UK. Consensus politics is when two major political parties, for example, the Conservative Party and Labour Party, are in agreement, or consensus, over certain basic government policies. The two parties still have small variations but they aren’t significant. They do this to gain voters from the middle ground. It reduces electoral choice because both parties share similar ideologies; it makes everything too similar without distinct variation. UK citizens have shown an obvious enthusiasm to vote for third parties and to clinch a form of political pluralism, which runs directly against the way FPTP operates. FPTP tends to produce a two-party system, which in turn tends to produce single-party governments. However, in a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantaged. This is why FPTP doesn’t work as well as it used to have done. As the UK is changing in terms of politics, more parties are getting involved however these parties have little or no chance in gaining support because of the unequal voting value. This is why I think the UK needs to improve on the FPTP system because it’s restricting it’s full democratic potential. The UK Parliament is built up of two Houses – the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The House of Commons has 646 MPs. The political party with the majority of MPs in the House of Commons forms the Government. The House of Lords has approximately 700 unelected members who examine the work of the House of Commons. The UK Parliament is the main democratic body in the UK and is comprised of three parts: the House of Commons, the House of Lords nd the Sovereign. The UK is a parliamentary democracy and unlike many other democracies it does not have a written constitution. A deliberative assembly is an organization comprising members who use parliamentary procedure to make decisions. A mass meeting, which is an unorganized group meeting open to all individuals in a sector of the population who are interested in to engage in long and careful conc ern about a subject proposed by the meeting’s sponsors. This can include meetings to discuss common political concerns or community interests. This helps towards the democratic process of UK parliament because it in cooperates everybody’s opinion. Parliament is essential to the democratic process in the UK because it is elected by the popular vote, which is therefore democratic, however it has been criticized for being undemocratic because the 2nd Chamber is entirely unelected. This weakens the representative role of parliament. Party discipline also prevents MP’s from using their own judgment in representing their constituents; it also restricts freedom of debate and voting in the House of Commons. Also Parliament’s ability to scrutinize the executive is weak because the government of the day usually has majority control of the House of Commons. Overall, Parliament is strength because it does solely represent the population. However the 2nd chamber is entirely unelected, which does weaken the representative role of parliament but that can be an improved. However, parliament does not govern, its role is to check or constrain the government of the day and it also discusses the policies. Parliament calls the government to account on policies. For those reasons it’s not entirely significant that the 2nd chamber is unelected. Another core feature of UK democracy are pressure groups. They enhance democracy in the UK, because they give a political voice to minorities that are ignored by the majoritarian parliament system. They also provide a way in which citizens can exert influence between elections and they also enhance political participation. However pressure groups don’t have legitimacy and since pressure groups are unelected, they aren’t representative of the majority of the population. Some pressure groups have owerful, but unrepresentative leaders who may not be representative of anyone but themselves. Some leaders do not reflect the opinions of their organization’s members. However, pressure groups are enormously enhancing of the UK democratic system because it gives a political voice to minorities. They allow the population to politically participate and put pressure on the government on issues, which they may turn a blind eye to. This in my opinion is strength of the UK democratic system. Other parts of the UK democratic system enhance democracy in the UK, such as referendums, devolution, the E. U and civil rights. A referendum is a direct vote in which an entire population is asked to either accept or reject a particular proposal. This increases political participation and involves the whole population. However, they can be non-binding. This means the government may not have to do what the results show. Devolution is also another feature of the UK democratic system that increases democracy in the UK. Devolution is the transfer of power from central government to subordinate regional institutions. This means they pass down the powers or duties down from a higher authority to a lower one. This gives the constituent nations of the UK their own political voice. It refined representative democracy by allowing voters in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland separately to express their views about national issues. It also widens the opportunities available for political participation. However the effectiveness of devolution in promoting democracy can be questioned because it has limited powers. Devolution stops well short of ‘home rule’ or full self-government. Although the powers of devolved bodies have, in some cases, widened, major economic and foreign policy decisions are still made at Westminster. Devolution has also done nothing to advance representative democracy in England, which is where 84% of the UK’s population lives. In my opinion referendums are effective in enhancing democracy in the UK because it increases political participation and it allows for a raw opinion on what the public think about particular issues. However, the government can’t be held accountable because they’re not the ones making the decision in a situation where a referendum is used to decide a particular proposal). Devolution however is ineffective in some cases because it doesn’t advance democracy in England, where 84% of the UK’s population lives. However, it does allow for the smaller areas of the UK to focus on particular issues that may be affected by local problems rather than national problems (for example rural area s in Wales). To conclude I think the UK is democratic to a certain degree. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and everyone has the right to free and fair elections. However the UK is being limited by certain blockages in the democratic system such as FPTP. Issues with FPTP can be resolved to allow the UK to reach its full potential of democracy. In a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantaged. This is why FPTP doesn’t work as well as it used to have done. As the UK is changing in terms of politics, more parties are getting involved however these parties have little or no chance in gaining support because of the unequal voting value. Strong points in the UK democratic features are pressure groups. They enhance the democracy in the UK, they allow the population to politically participate and put pressure on the government on issues, which they may turn a blind eye to. This in my opinion is strength of the UK democratic system. Referendums are also effective in enhancing democracy in the UK because it increases political participation and it allows for a raw opinion on what the public think about particular issues. So, to a certain degree, I think the United Kingdom has a strong democratic system. How to cite How Democratic Is the Uk?, Essay examples